Max Noichl
Utrecht University
2024-05-14
Arianna Betti “Towards a Computational History of Ideas,” CEUR Workshop Proceedings, no. 1681 (2016): 13. Oliver M. Lean, Luca Rivelli, and Charles H. Pence “Digital Literature Analysis for Empirical Philosophy of Science,” The British Journal for the Philosophy of Science, April 2021, 715049.

Ludwig Wittgenstein Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus, trans. Charles Ogden (2010).
6.53 The right method of philosophy would be this: To say nothing except what can be said, i.e. the propositions of natural science, i.e. something that has nothing to do with philosophy; and then always, when someone else wished to say something metaphysical, to demonstrate to him that he had given no meaning to certain signs in his propositions. This method would be unsatisfying to the other—he would not have the feeling that we were teaching him philosophy—but it would be the only strictly correct method.
Otto Neurath, Hans Hahn, and Rudolf Carnap “Wissenschaftliche Weltauffassung: Der Wiener Kreis,” in Empiricism and Sociology, ed. Marie Neurath and Robert S. Cohen, Vienna Circle Collection (Dordrecht, 1973), 299–318.
This method of logical analysis is what essentially distinguishes the new empiricism and positivism from the earlier one, which was more biologically-psychologically oriented. When someone claims: “There is no God”, “The primal foundation of the world is the unconscious” […] we don’t tell them: “What you say is false”; instead, we ask them: “What do you mean by your statements?” And then it turns out that there is a sharp boundary between two types of statements. To one group belong the statements made in empirical science; their meaning can be determined through logical analysis, more precisely: by reducing them to the simplest statements about empirically given things. The other statements, including the ones mentioned earlier, turn out to be completely meaningless if one takes them as the metaphysician means them.

It belongs to what is taken for granted, prior to all scientific thought and all philosophical questioning, that the world is—always is in advance—and that every correction of an opinion, whether an experiential or other opinion, presupposes the already existing world, namely as a horizon of what in the given case is indubitably valid as existing. Objective science, too, asks questions only on the ground of the world’s existing in advance through prescientific life.
Michel Foucault The Order of Things: An Archaeology of the Human Sciences, Vintage books edition (New York NY, 1994).
Quite obviously, such an analysis does not belong to the history of ideas or of science: it is rather an inquiry whose aim is to rediscover on what basis knowledge and theory become possible; within what space of order knowledge was constituted; on the basis of what historical a priori, and in the element of what positivity, ideas could appear, sciences be established, experience be reflected in philosophies, rationalities be formed, only perhaps, to dissolve and vanish soon afterwards.



Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych “Making Monolingual Sentence Embeddings Multilingual Using Knowledge Distillation” (October 2020)., Nils Reimers and Iryna Gurevych “Sentence-BERT: Sentence Embeddings Using Siamese BERT-Networks” (August 2019).


Isaac Waller and Ashton Anderson “Community Embeddings Reveal Large-Scale Cultural Organization of Online Platforms,” arXiv:2010.00590 [Cs], October 2020.



Jonathan Strassfeld “American Divide: The Making of ‘Continental’ Philosophy,” Modern Intellectual History 17, no. 3 (September 2020): 833–66.








Sarah-Jane Leslie et al. “Expectations of Brilliance Underlie Gender Distributions Across Academic Disciplines,” Science 347, no. 6219 (2015): 262–65., Catherine Herfeld, Jan Müller, and Kathrin Von Allmen “Why Do Women Philosophy Students Drop Out of Philosophy? Some Evidence from the Classroom at the Bachelor’s Level,” Ergo an Open Access Journal of Philosophy 8, no. 0 (December 2022).

Valerie Hobbs “Accounting for the Great Divide: Features of Clarity in Analytic Philosophy Journal Articles,” Journal of English for Academic Purposes 15 (September 2014): 27–36.,Alejandro Martínez and Stefano Mammola “Specialized Terminology Reduces the Number of Citations of Scientific Papers,” Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences 288, no. 1948 (April 2021): rspb.2020.2581, 20202581.

